Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] v1.7 - Add patent support #597

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: 1.7-dev
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

stevespringett
Copy link
Member

Implements patent support. Closes #596


TODO/DONE

  • add examples for XML
  • add examples for JSON
  • add examples for ProtoBuf
  • implement for XML
  • implement for JSON
  • implement for ProtoBuf

Signed-off-by: Steve Springett <[email protected]>
@stevespringett stevespringett changed the title Initial checkin of patent support Add patent support Feb 10, 2025
@stevespringett stevespringett linked an issue Feb 11, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@jkowalleck jkowalleck changed the title Add patent support [WIP] v1.7 - Add patent support Feb 12, 2025
@jkowalleck jkowalleck added this to the 1.7 milestone Feb 17, 2025
"bom-ref": "patent-1",
"patentNumber": "US1234567890",
"applicationNumber": "12345",
"jurisdiction": "US",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In US, We apply for two patents one that covers US and another that covers International scope. The jurisdiction is still US but the patent would cover all countries that have US agreements in place.

I think we should separate the jurisdiction vs grant type/scope - US vs international.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe that use case is handled by patent families, which group patents filed into different jurisdictions and which represent a single thing that is being patented. That approach aligns with ST.96.

@stevespringett
Copy link
Member Author

@planetlevel would you be able to review this? We have worked with WIPO on providing summary information for patents and patent families and we believe our current support for both of these are correct. Let us know otherwise. However, I'm particularly interested in a review of the patent assertions which allow BOM creators to assert their relationship with the patent (owner, licensing, etc).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE]: Add support for referencing patent information
3 participants