Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[15.0] [MIG] product_variant_configurator #268

Merged
merged 77 commits into from
Sep 2, 2022

Conversation

JasminSForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

Standard Migration

@ForgeFlow

zakmak88 and others added 30 commits July 14, 2022 10:14
This module has been ported from the odoomrp repo.
the module name in the odoo mrp repo was product_variants_no_automatic_creation
the following improvement where done while porting this module:

* Improve the readme file with a technical description on how the module should
  be used with other modules.
* Add attribute col=4 to group parent for a better desplay of product category
  for view.
* Remove unnecessary @api.multi before compute or onchange methods.
* Move product.configurator.attribute model to the new
  product_configurator_attribute.py file.
* Add unit test for product.configurator.attribute model that includes test for
  _compute_possible_value_ids and _compute_price_extra methods.
* Rename XML files in views and security folder as per OCA guidelines.
* Improve test coverage for product_configurator.
* Add unit test for purchase.order and purchase.order.line models.
* Separate the purchase.order and purchase.order.line models code into two files.
* Rename XML files as per OCA guidelines.
* product_variant_configurator: set product_tmpl_id in
  onchange_product_id_product_configurator_old_api and
  onchange_product_id_product_configurator methods for product.configurator model.
* Add unit test for onchange_product_tmpl_id and onchange_product_attribute_ids.
…doomrp repo. the following improvements were done while porting this module:

* Adapt files as per OCA guidelines.
* Add unit test
What helps is setting the many2many_tags which seems to have an
influence even though the field is invisible. Without this you sometimes
get a warning asking if you want to discard the last change.
Setting the computed field readonly is also good practice.

[IMP] new api style in onchange for updating attributes list
[IMP] better to avoid overrides of onchange method (#2)
[REF] refactoring of the onchanges

This should be easier to understand and cover all cases of
changing product template and product in any order, so you
always get a consistent list of attributes.

[FIX] fix tests in purchase_product_variant_configurator

[FIX] avoid systematic warning when creating new product templates
because I don't know how to emulate a true onchange that
populates _origin
… are for sale only

plus, fix the visibility rule of the button,
to show the button if there are attributes on the product
(otherwise it would stay hidden until the first 2 variants
have been created)

[FIX] more robust configurator onchanges

[FIX] return values for onchange_product_attribute_ids
…vepoint to discard created product variant in case of exception
* Issue with cache invalidation on create
* remove unused _create_variant_from_vals
* hide price_extra not applicable to purchase for now
* remove import on removed procurement_order.py file
* Fix tests in purchase_product_variant_configurator
* Fix tests in product_variant_configurator
…elete' attribute on the field owner_id declared as Integer is required since this field is declared as inverse of the field product_attribute_ids of the abstract model product.configurator
…f.attribute_line_ids/not tmpl.attribute_line_ids
With this, you can decide at product level which attributes are required
to be filled. Default is true for keeping the same logic with previous
version.
Updated by Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge) hook in Weblate.
Copy link

@AaronHForgeFlow AaronHForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional review. Works as expected.

@mariadforgeflow
Copy link

mariadforgeflow commented Jul 20, 2022

Hi @JasminSForgeFlow! I got the following error when creating a Product Variant:
image

I think that the issue arises because when clicking on the Create button, product_tmpl_id has a value and it doesn't enter in the first return:
image

@JasminSForgeFlow JasminSForgeFlow force-pushed the 15.0-mig-product_variant_configurator branch from 4abe85b to 05a5dde Compare July 20, 2022 09:19
@JasminSForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @JasminSForgeFlow! I got the following error when creating a Product Variant: image

I think that the issue arises because when clicking on the Create button, product_tmpl_id has a value and it doesn't enter in the first return: image

It's fixed.
Thanks

@JasminSForgeFlow JasminSForgeFlow force-pushed the 15.0-mig-product_variant_configurator branch from 05a5dde to ca32251 Compare July 20, 2022 09:46
Copy link

@mariadforgeflow mariadforgeflow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Functional and code review.

Copy link

@DavidJForgeFlow DavidJForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works as expected, LGTM!

@JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration product_variant_configurator
/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 15.0 milestone Sep 2, 2022
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2022
9 tasks
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 15.0-ocabot-merge-pr-268-by-JordiBForgeFlow-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit e0a5de3 into OCA:15.0 Sep 2, 2022
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 2b9dad0. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@MiquelRForgeFlow MiquelRForgeFlow deleted the 15.0-mig-product_variant_configurator branch October 6, 2022 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.