front: add rolling stock categories

[Synar]

Close #10691
Depend on #10701

Behavior and translations should be fine, but the css could still use a little improvement ^^

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 19.00826% with 98 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.62%. Comparing base (57034a3) to head (bf9ae66).
Report is 10 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...llingStockEditor/RollingStockEditorFormHelpers.tsx	1.40%	70 Missing ⚠️
...onents/RollingStockCard/RollingStockCardDetail.tsx	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
...ents/RollingStockEditor/RollingStockEditorForm.tsx	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
front/src/modules/rollingStock/helpers/utils.ts	12.50%	7 Missing ⚠️
front/src/common/BootstrapSNCF/SelectSNCF.tsx	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev   #10790      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.56%   81.62%   -0.94%     
==========================================
  Files        1087     1095       +8     
  Lines      108129   110398    +2269     
  Branches      742      742              
==========================================
+ Hits        89272    90114     +842     
- Misses      18815    20242    +1427     
  Partials       42       42              

Flag	Coverage Δ
editoast	72.18% <ø> (-2.21%)	⬇️
front	90.26% <19.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
gateway	2.18% <ø> (ø)
osrdyne	2.98% <ø> (-0.31%)	⬇️
railjson_generator	87.58% <ø> (ø)
tests	87.90% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[SharglutDev]

Thank you for the PR. Left some comments. I'm a bit confused on some AC, maybe there need to be some extra discussions with @maelysLeratRosso and/or @thibautsailly regarding the "requiredness" of the primary category :)

[SharglutDev]

Lgtm and tested, great job !
You can resolve the last comment when fixed (and don't forget to squash)

[Maymanaf]

Good job! But can you enhance the E2E tests?
For the "Create a new rolling stock" test:

• Verify that the primary category is checked and disabled in other categories
• Check additional categories and verify that they are selected
• Verify the categories after rolling stock creation

For the "Duplicate and modify a rolling stock" test:

• Modify the primary category
• Select additional categories
• Verify that the categories are updated after saving

[Maymanaf]

Great job !
LGTM for e2e tests ✅