Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove legacy switch port connection bidirectional #5651

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2023

Conversation

flomonster
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@flomonster flomonster requested a review from a team as a code owner November 10, 2023 16:01
@flomonster flomonster requested a review from multun November 10, 2023 16:01
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #5651 (c950d94) into dev (2600737) will not change coverage.
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                dev    #5651   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     19.58%   19.58%           
  Complexity     2322     2322           
=========================================
  Files           886      886           
  Lines        105766   105766           
  Branches       2572     2572           
=========================================
  Hits          20716    20716           
  Misses        83541    83541           
  Partials       1509     1509           
Flag Coverage Δ
core 78.79% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...sncf/osrd/railjson/schema/infra/RJSSwitchType.java 96.87% <100.00%> (ø)

@multun multun added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 11, 2023
Merged via the queue into dev with commit 7f3a113 Nov 11, 2023
@multun multun deleted the fam/remove-legacy-bidirectional-switch-link branch November 11, 2023 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants