front: redesign map in result page

[theocrsb]

closes part of https://github.com/osrd-project/osrd-confidential/issues/670

For the redesign of the buttons I'm going to do another PR because this part is optional and I don't have the mockup.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39.76%. Comparing base (a9261bc) to head (37a92e4).
Report is 2 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...omponents/SimulationResultsMap/RenderItinerary.tsx	0.00%	24 Missing ⚠️
...hedule/ManageTrainScheduleMap/ItineraryMarkers.tsx	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...ns/stdcm/components/StdcmForm/StdcmDestination.tsx	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...cations/stdcm/components/StdcmForm/StdcmOrigin.tsx	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...lications/stdcm/components/StdcmForm/StdcmVias.tsx	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #9481      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     39.77%   39.76%   -0.02%     
  Complexity     2270     2270              
============================================
  Files          1302     1302              
  Lines         99546    99565      +19     
  Branches       3282     3282              
============================================
- Hits          39598    39592       -6     
- Misses        58016    58041      +25     
  Partials       1932     1932              

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	75.06% <ø> (ø)
editoast	73.55% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
front	10.20% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
gateway	2.19% <ø> (ø)
osrdyne	3.28% <ø> (ø)
railjson_generator	87.49% <ø> (ø)
tests	86.71% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Akctarus]

Tested, LGTM, I think STDCM map needs to be updated too to match this redesign. Left 2 comments

[clarani]

This PR will also add the origin/destination markers to the warped map, is it what we want ?

[SharglutDev]

This PR will also add the origin/destination markers to the warped map, is it what we want ?

Should we ask a PO since @thibautsailly isn't here ?

[theocrsb]

This PR will also add the origin/destination markers to the warped map, is it what we want ?

Should we ask a PO since @thibautsailly isn't here ?

I asked to @Tguisnet

[SharglutDev]

Lgtm and tested

[SharglutDev]

Actually the map mockup says this :

So I think we should also display the vias

[clarani]

LGTM ✅

[Tguisnet]

This PR will also add the origin/destination markers to the warped map, is it what we want ?

There are no real specifications for the warp map, so it's complicated to know what we want to have on it.
But the warp map is currently reversed (from the implementation of the new GET), so at least we could see how its works now with this markers :).

I think we could merge this PR, there are a lot of adjustements coming soon for the result page, the warp map probably won't follow all of the changes, so we'll have to specify what we want for the warp map, but later.