OSRD stage 2

[flomonster]

Feedback:

• I don't know if editing the project_proposals/osrd.md file is the right thing to do for this request.
• The first three criteria are very similar. At least the only thing to fill in as a project is the link to the repository pulses.
• Not sure it was the best way to proof the usage of REUSE and DCO
• There are no criteria for the openness of communication channels with contributors. The fact that OSRD has a matrix server accessible to all makes it easier to integrate contributors from outside SNCF.
• Requiring projects to have dependencies security alerts and secret scanning alerts seems reasonable for stage 2 (it's a small proof of maturity).

[cornelius]

From yesterday's TC meeting:

• I don't know if editing the project_proposals/osrd.md file is the right thing to do for this request.

We will provide a separate questionnaire, so that the stages are separated and there is no confusion about what to add when and where.

• The first three criteria are very similar. At least the only thing to fill in as a project is the link to the repository pulses.

We will keep this relatively free-form. Adding an explanation and links to metrics such as the repo pulse is probably good
enough as a base for the evaluation for now.

• Not sure it was the best way to proof the usage of REUSE and DCO

We will add more details in the questionnaire (which is still to be created as a separate file).

• There are no criteria for the openness of communication channels with contributors. The fact that OSRD has a matrix server accessible to all makes it easier to integrate contributors from outside SNCF.

To be documented in more detail.

• Requiring projects to have dependencies security alerts and secret scanning alerts seems reasonable for stage 2 (it's a small proof of maturity).

Good point, should be added.

[schalbts]

After review at the last TC meeting and browsing through again today, it looks good to me.

[cornelius]

🎆