Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

liblrs proposal #88

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

liblrs proposal #88

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

loic-hamelin
Copy link
Collaborator

Questionnaire for liblrs project.

Questionnaire for liblrs project.
cornelius and others added 3 commits July 5, 2024 14:46
Co-authored-by: Tristram Gräbener <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tristram Gräbener <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Serge Croisé <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@cornelius cornelius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sounds like a very solid proposal. It's a well-defined project with an active group of maintainers and a clear governance structure. It's relatively small, but that's good for a building block other projects can use.

There are a few changes in documentation needed to meet the standards of our minimal viable governance templates (https://github.com/OpenRailAssociation/technical-committee/tree/main/project-templates), but I don't see any indication that this would be an issue. We can also sort this out when the repo is becoming part of the OpenRail Assocation organization.

@cornelius
Copy link
Member

The Technical Committee has decided to accept the project on 2024-07-09.

@cornelius
Copy link
Member

Accepted by vote of board on 2024-07-12.

@cornelius cornelius merged commit ac72de1 into main Jul 16, 2024
@cornelius cornelius deleted the liblrs-application branch July 16, 2024 11:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants