-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add "valid_issuers" field in openidc plugin #12002
Open
Revolyssup
wants to merge
13
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
Revolyssup:revolyssup/oidc
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+471
−11
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0208ad1
feat: add "valid_issuers" field in openidc plugin
Revolyssup 5edc3e0
test
Revolyssup 7fdccb2
lint
Revolyssup e7c9e56
fix tests
Revolyssup 624bf50
remove redundant test
Revolyssup 4bf171a
only validate issuer with jwks
Revolyssup 4b1a69d
add docs
Revolyssup b672a8b
add tests
Revolyssup 0ea7647
fix lint
Revolyssup adf5af6
apply suggestion
Revolyssup 580a515
verify in pub key
Revolyssup 085cf49
fix tests
Revolyssup 6f4ede5
fix test
Revolyssup File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This has already had another implementation that was approved and we have to decide which one is better.
#11987
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your PR adds audience validation and my PR adds issuer validation.
Audience validation matches "aud" in the JWT with "client_id"
Issuer validation matches "issuer" in the JWT with discovery.issuer/or passed by user.
If the problem that I am trying to solve is this "I want to reject a request because customer passed a JWT with unrecognised issuer."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bzp2010
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Revolyssup 🙌
I certainly know what I did, and know what you did, and I mentioned that we have to choose one of the better configuration schema designs, while accommodating design that are similar in use but so different is unacceptable.
Specifically, if they are tiled, then this and all subsequent validator configuration items need to be tiled, otherwise it's going to be structured like that PR #11987.
That's exactly why that PR hasn't merged yet, it's waiting for some feedback.