Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

User expandable harmonization #1315

Open
navtej opened this issue Sep 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

User expandable harmonization #1315

navtej opened this issue Sep 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
architecture component: configuration component: core feature Indicates new feature requests or new features

Comments

@navtej
Copy link
Contributor

navtej commented Sep 5, 2018

Should we have user defined harmonization fields as an extension to existing fields?
We can have a file user-harmonization.conf to define custom harmonization types and load those values along with standard values. This needs bit more thinking on storage and sharing of data aspects. Thoughts?
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 5, 2018

Yeah, in the next versions I want work on making intelmq more pluggable, see also #972 and others.
So then bot's could also add their own required fields to the harmonization.

Idea:
instead of having a single harmonization.conf use a harmonization.conf.d, where both other components/python packages and users can add their own files.

@ghost ghost added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Sep 5, 2018
@ghost ghost added feature Indicates new feature requests or new features architecture component: core component: configuration labels Sep 5, 2018
@ghost ghost modified the milestones: 1.2.0, 2.0.0, 2.1.0 Apr 9, 2019
@ghost ghost modified the milestones: 2.1.0, 2.2.0 Oct 25, 2019
@ghost ghost modified the milestones: 2.2.0, 3.0.0 Jun 17, 2020
@aaronkaplan
Copy link
Member

covered in the intelmq 3.0 architecture

@ghost ghost removed this from the 3.0.0 milestone Mar 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
architecture component: configuration component: core feature Indicates new feature requests or new features
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@navtej @aaronkaplan