Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mapping OS fields for mobile devices (e.g. Android, iOS) #1995

Closed
AlexanderWert opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1999
Closed

Mapping OS fields for mobile devices (e.g. Android, iOS) #1995

AlexanderWert opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1999
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@AlexanderWert
Copy link
Member

Summary
For the APM Mobile agents we would like to properly populate the Operating System Fields.
What is not clear to me is what we would set for os.type and os.platform in case of iOS and Android.

Let's take the example of iOS. According to the description of os.type there is no allowed value that would be valid (because Macos is not iOSand ios is not allowed as a value). Also, in this case, os.platform would have the value darwin (since iOS is based on Darwin). But darwin could also mean that it's a MacOS device (not mobile). So, there is no field where we could put the value ios in to properly categorize the operating system in this case.

Motivation:
Capture and categorize the operating system of mobile devices properly.

Detailed Design:
Does it make sense to add the following values as valid values for os.type?:

  • ios
  • android

Or are there other ideas how we could handle the scenario described above?

@AlexanderWert AlexanderWert added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 19, 2022
@kgeller
Copy link
Contributor

kgeller commented Jul 26, 2022

I think that it does make sense to add ios and android to acceptable values for os.type, and I'd invite you to open a PR to allow that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants