[Stage 0/1] Initial draft for IO fieldset RFC

[mitodrummer]

• Have you signed the contributor license agreement? yes
• Have you followed the contributor guidelines? yes
• For proposing substantial changes or additions to the schema, have you reviewed the RFC process? yes
• If submitting code/script changes, have you verified all tests pass locally using make test? n/a
• If submitting schema/fields updates, have you generated new artifacts by running make and committed those changes? n/a
• Is your pull request against main? Unless there is a good reason otherwise, we prefer pull requests against main and will backport as needed. yes
• Have you added an entry to the CHANGELOG.next.md? no

[m-sample]

Some suggested tightening of the descriptive text. Otherwise this looks great and reflects exactly what we discussed.

[m-sample]

Looks great @mitodrummer. Nice work.

[mitodrummer]

@ebeahan This PR should be ready to move to the next stage.

[kgeller]

@mitodrummer this looks great.

Before merge, could you update your folder to 0035 since that's the RFC number?

[mitodrummer]

@mitodrummer this looks great.

Before merge, could you update your folder to 0035 since that's the RFC number?

Done!

What stage do we go to next? I don't think there will be any further updates afaik. Let me know if I need to open up another PR. TY!

[kgeller]

@mitodrummer what do you think about putting it this to stage 2? Then the fields can be added as beta, just like the linux event model RFC. And then down the line when you're sure it's not going to change, we can move to stage 3 and remove the beta tags.

[mitodrummer]

@mitodrummer what do you think about putting it this to stage 2? Then the fields can be added as beta, just like the linux event model RFC. And then down the line when you're sure it's not going to change, we can move to stage 3 and remove the beta tags.

Sounds good to me. Did you need me to update the stage/date in the md file before I merge?

[kgeller]

LGTM