Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change
device
toobserver
#238Change
device
toobserver
#238Changes from 5 commits
07b058f
da4c345
1fa06fd
f805cf9
3f62009
8278c21
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So yeah, please make sure to remove this section before merging ;-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍🏼
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@graphaelli Can you leave your comment on this one? APM-Server is in here :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Elastic APM server typically operates as more as a message queue using this definition. Would logstash be considered an observer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say even if APM server doesn't do a lot of work on the payload, compared to the library installed in each app, it could still be considered as the observer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works for me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps it makes sense for an observer simply to be an entity that works on behalf of an agent to report its data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@graphaelli I think our definition of observer needs to extend beyond what you suggest to include firewalls and network IDS, etc. that don't have an agent at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@graphaelli Yes, LS is in many cases also the observer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that compared to the agent the server doesn't do a lot with the payload currently. However, I am not sure that this is a general enough criteria for not considering the server an ETL component. There are some additions and changes the server does, and going forward with ECS, the server will change the structure of events even more in the future, as there need to be a mapping from the incoming events to the ES ECS structure.
My point is, I assume that
should clarify what to consider an observer and what not, but for me it introduces more confusion.
This file was deleted.