Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Promote beta fields to GA in v9.x #2411

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

mjwolf
Copy link
Contributor

@mjwolf mjwolf commented Dec 6, 2024

Promote beta fields that have been present since the previous major release to GA

  • cloud.origin
  • cloud.target
  • elf fields
  • event.kind->asset type
  • faas fields
  • host.boot_id
  • host.pid_ns_inode
  • volume fields

  • Have you signed the contributor license agreement? y
  • Have you followed the contributor guidelines? y
  • For proposing substantial changes or additions to the schema, have you reviewed the RFC process? y
  • If submitting code/script changes, have you verified all tests pass locally using make test? y
  • If submitting schema/fields updates, have you generated new artifacts by running make and committed those changes? y
  • Is your pull request against main? Unless there is a good reason otherwise, we prefer pull requests against main and will backport as needed. y
  • Have you added an entry to the CHANGELOG.next.md? y

Promote beta fields that have been present since the previous major release to GA

* cloud.origin
* cloud.target
* elf fields
* event.kind->asset type
* faas fields
* process.boot_id
* process.pid_ns_inode
* volume fields
@mjwolf mjwolf requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2024 02:16
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Documentation changes preview: https://ecs_bk_2411.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/diff

Copy link
Contributor

@taylor-swanson taylor-swanson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Description says:

process.boot_id
process.pid_ns_inode

But the diff says host instead of process. Should the description say host instead?

Also looks like there are some linter errors?

@mjwolf
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjwolf commented Feb 4, 2025

Description says:

process.boot_id process.pid_ns_inode

But the diff says host instead of process. Should the description say host instead?

Good catch, those should be host, I've updated the description

@mjwolf mjwolf requested a review from taylor-swanson February 4, 2025 18:55
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

It looks like this PR modifies one or more .asciidoc files. These files are being migrated to Markdown, and any changes merged now will be lost. See the migration guide for details.

Copy link

Warning

It looks like this PR modifies one or more .asciidoc files. These files are being migrated to Markdown, and any changes merged now will be lost. See the migration guide for details.

@mjwolf mjwolf merged commit eaecbe7 into elastic:main Feb 12, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@mjwolf mjwolf deleted the promote-beta-fields branch February 12, 2025 20:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants