Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Add PDB for distributors #16487

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

poyzannur
Copy link
Contributor

@poyzannur poyzannur commented Feb 27, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist

  • Reviewed the CONTRIBUTING.md guide (required)
  • Documentation added
  • Tests updated
  • Title matches the required conventional commits format, see here
    • Note that Promtail is considered to be feature complete, and future development for logs collection will be in Grafana Alloy. As such, feat PRs are unlikely to be accepted unless a case can be made for the feature actually being a bug fix to existing behavior.
  • Changes that require user attention or interaction to upgrade are documented in docs/sources/setup/upgrade/_index.md
  • If the change is deprecating or removing a configuration option, update the deprecated-config.yaml and deleted-config.yaml files respectively in the tools/deprecated-config-checker directory. Example PR

@poyzannur poyzannur force-pushed the poyzan/add-pdb-for-distributors branch from e387008 to 8639b8f Compare February 27, 2025 10:32
@poyzannur poyzannur changed the title Add PDB for distributors chore[distributor]: Add PDB for distributors Feb 27, 2025
@poyzannur poyzannur changed the title chore[distributor]: Add PDB for distributors chore: Add PDB for distributors Feb 27, 2025
@poyzannur poyzannur self-assigned this Feb 27, 2025
@poyzannur poyzannur marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 11:51
@poyzannur poyzannur requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2025 11:51
@@ -47,6 +47,14 @@ local k = import 'ksonnet-util/kausal.libsonnet';
else
k.util.antiAffinity,

distributor_pdb:
local podDisruptionBudget = $.policy.v1.podDisruptionBudget;
Copy link
Contributor

@ashwanthgoli ashwanthgoli Feb 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: should we use k.policy.v1.podDisruptionBudget for clarity? I see this usage in other files $.policy.v1.podDisruptionBudget, not sure how ksonnet-util/kausal.libsonnet contents ended up being at top-level

Copy link
Contributor

@ashwanthgoli ashwanthgoli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants