-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add label filter to job resource #4152
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add label filter to job resource #4152
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ambersun1234 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Welcome @ambersun1234! |
Hi @ambersun1234. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ webhooks: | |||
path: /mutate-batch-v1-job | |||
failurePolicy: Fail | |||
name: mjob.kb.io | |||
objectSelector: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me try to understand, with this you narrowed down Kueue webhooks application to jobs with app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: kueue
label?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, only Job with app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: kueue
label will be intercept by Kueue
/hold |
If there's multiple jobs, each job have different queue name associate with it, then the label kueue.x-k8s.io/queue-name can't work properly, you'll need to include all possible "queue names" to objectselector, which in my opinion is not viable |
I think the selectors allow to filter just by label key presence, e.g. EDIT: you may need to use kueue/apis/config/v1beta1/defaults.go Lines 168 to 174 in 8541885
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not think that we should introduce such a label selector.
If you want to add arbitrary label selector, you could add those by your kustomize override, IMO
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR add a label filter to Job resource kind to prevent Kueue from intercepting unintended resource instance
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #4141
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?