AppArmor: make policy field optional if abstract policy is specified

[mhils]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR makes the policy field optional for AppArmor policies.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

#2388

Does this PR have test?

Covered by existing tests

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

AppArmor profiles can now have either an abstract or a concrete policy.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @mhils. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 35.29412% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 41.84%. Comparing base (11d77f4) to head (f939b49).
Report is 445 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2469      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   45.50%   41.84%   -3.67%     
==========================================
  Files          79      109      +30     
  Lines        7782    16025    +8243     
==========================================
+ Hits         3541     6705    +3164     
- Misses       4099     8824    +4725     
- Partials      142      496     +354     

[ccojocar]

I think you need to regenerate the bundle since the profile manifest was changed.

[saschagrunert]

Please rebase this one as well.

[saschagrunert]

The OLM bundles do not seem to be up to date: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/security-profiles-operator/actions/runs/11300455856/job/31483016900?pr=2469

[mhils]

Thanks @saschagrunert! Is it intentional that make verify does not include make verify-bundle? 😅

[saschagrunert]

Thanks @saschagrunert! Is it intentional that make verify does not include make verify-bundle? 😅

Hm, we could add it indeed. 🤔

[saschagrunert]

/ok-to-test

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ccojocar, mhils, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [ccojocar,saschagrunert]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment