Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix local testing mode by skipping downstream-only config setting #323

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

asb
Copy link
Contributor

@asb asb commented Nov 28, 2024

Ideally we'd better replicate the the deployed config, but this hopefully moves things forward. Note: as the GitHub Actions pre-commit testing relies on "local testing mode", this PR fixes that too.

@gkistanova the requirements.txt just references a local checkout for the buildbot version being used - the other libs are all 3.11.7 so that's what I use for the GitHub actions and the guidance for "local testing mode". Is there a public repo of the buildbot fork that is deployed?

Ideally we'd better replicate the the upstream config, but this
hopefully moves things forward.
Copy link
Member

@nickdesaulniers nickdesaulniers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah! This is a downstream only change to buildbot! No wonder why I couldn't find any documentation about this. It's blocking my presubmit testing of #325, so +1.

@asb
Copy link
Contributor Author

asb commented Dec 3, 2024

Thanks for the review, merging now to hopefully avoid more wasted time due to the caused confusion.

Once you get a chance @gkistanova it would be great if you could say more about the downstream buildbot patches and if there's a publicly accessible repo (perhaps it could be created under github.com/llvm ?). Thanks!

@asb asb merged commit fab27e2 into llvm:main Dec 3, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants