Add project in provider

[QuentinBrosse]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

A new project feature will be available in public beta soon. We need to add the ability to specify a default project in the Scaleway provider.

New or Affected Resource(s)

• scaleway

Potential Terraform Configuration

provider "scaleway" {
  access_key      = "<SCALEWAY-ACCESS-KEY>"
  secret_key      = "<SCALEWAY-SECRET-KEY>"
  organization_id = "<SCALEWAY-ORGANIZATION-ID>"
  project_id      = "<SCALEWAY-PROJECT-ID>"
  zone            = "fr-par-1"
  region          = "fr-par"
}

To Do

• Add the project_id field in the provider.
• Add a SCW_DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID environment variable
• Update the provider documentation

References

• #0000

[fredleger]

I don't really get why since the API keys are now scoped to projects this could not be used to auto determine the target project. I did assume so at the first glance so i guess this should be mentioned in the documentation that you need to wait for this issue to be closed if you want to use the provider to provision things inside projects.

[QuentinBrosse]

@fredleger you can already provision your resource in a project by setting your project_id in the organization_id field and your project API key in the access_key and secret_key field (it's backward compatible). But yes, this issue will provide cleaner support of Project. :)

I think it's better to provide explicitly the project_id in which you want to provision your resources. It will allow having API keys with custom scopes (only some resources of a project, multiple projects, etc.). This kind of feature is in our roadmap.

[fredleger]

@QuentinBrosse Great didn't get that reading the docs. I think it can be wise to mention it until this issue is completed. See PR above.

[QuentinBrosse]

@fredleger thanks! 👌