Content Identifiers for Software Artifacts #701
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alexios Zavras (zvr) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexios Zavras (zvr) <[email protected]>
|
Discussion on the tech call 4/9 favored removing the gitoid property in favor of this generalized type. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please remove gitoid as it is redundant and confusing to implementers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@JPEWdev do you want me to do it in this PR, or do you want to approve this one and I can create a new one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A separate PR is fine, but it is a breaking 3.0 change so it needs to be resolved before release
|
@jeff-schutt will review after the call today then we can merge with changes above. |
Co-authored-by: Maximilian Huber <[email protected]>
|
This PR goes against a prior agreement, documented here:
|
|
It does not "go against" something discussed in 2022, since it still allows using a gitoid as a content identifier. |
Signed-off-by: Alexios Zavras (zvr) <[email protected]>
|
Nevermind, we did say AnyURI was OK |
|
Discussed with Kate offline, this PR is ready to merge. |
This adds a general system for supporting various content identifiers for Software Artifacts.
It adds a new property on
SoftwareArtifact, its class, and a vocabulary for different types of identifiers (which can be expanded in the future, with no breaking changes).This is re-work of #611