Add Annex F: History, Motivation and Rational

[bact]

• Using text and 4 figures from Bob's Word doc 2024-07-04

Notes

• SPDX is stylized as "Software Package Data eXchange" and "System Package Data eXchange" in this annex (same as in the new Introduction, as the last two paragraphs of this annex are largely similar to the Intro).
  • While in other instances of the spec, they are written as "Software Package Data Exchange" and "System Package Data Exchange".
  • Do we like to change both of them to a regular spelling?
• Links. These two links at the end of the doc may need an update for 3.0.1:

  The SPDX 3.0 ontology is available at:
  https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/tree/development/v3.0/ontology

  The SPDX 3.0 specification is available as web pages at:
  https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0/

[bobmartin3000]

LGTM

[bact]

Note the links to model, ontology, and spec at Lines 136-143. These may need to recheck before publication.

[goneall]

Since this is the history from an ISO perspective, we should start with SPDX history going back to 1.0 then, more importantly, through the previous ISO submission then adding this additional information.

I wonder if this chapter is even needed for the ISO submission since our prior submission did not include this level of detail. If it isn't required, I would recommend removing it.

[goneall]

Since this is the history from an ISO perspective, we should start with SPDX history going back to 1.0 then, more importantly, through the previous ISO submission then adding this additional information.

I wonder if this chapter is even needed for the ISO submission since our prior submission did not include this level of detail. If it isn't required, I would recommend removing it.

In reading further, it looks like the SPDX history is there, but much later in the document. Perhaps reordering the history to start more at the beginning may fix the problem.

[kestewart]

Met with @bact, @goneall and decided this needs to be redone/renumbered, and depends on #992 being applied first.

Discussion is this isn't essential for the .pdf, and can be handled in a cover letter to OMG with the .pdf; and if we want to include it for ISO submission; probably needs to be reworked as described above.

[kestewart]

No longer Annex F (if we end up including). Needs discussion.

[goneall]

Also note that the annex numbering needs to change and the mkdocs.yaml file needs to be updated.

[kestewart]

I'm fine with this going to OMG. This needs the Annex F references updated.

[kestewart]

Approve this as long as added to mkdocs

[goneall]

LGTM

[bact]

Please use #1053 instead