Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

iter_lines: added new 'buffer_size' parameter, and updated docstrings #582

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2022

Conversation

koreno
Copy link
Collaborator

@koreno koreno commented Jan 28, 2022

No description provided.

@koreno koreno requested a review from henryiii January 28, 2022 22:17
@koreno koreno force-pushed the iter-lines-buffer-cap branch from 6f0be6c to a0aacc0 Compare January 29, 2022 10:14
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 83.608% when pulling a0aacc0 on iter-lines-buffer-cap into 5e27bb1 on master.

Copy link
Collaborator

@henryiii henryiii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine. I think we should try to look as much like Python 3's subprocess, but this method is not one from subprocess AFAIK, so don't have strong opinions on adding a bit of functionality here. If my one tiny suggestion is fine, I think it's good to merge.

@henryiii henryiii merged commit 55a5058 into master Jan 29, 2022
@henryiii henryiii deleted the iter-lines-buffer-cap branch January 29, 2022 19:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants