Sweep: Add a code field to each case and show it in the UI (✓ Sandbox Passed) #120
Conversation
![sweep-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/307814?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Rollback Files For Sweep
This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI. |
Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?
This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI. |
|
@CodiumAI-Agent /review |
PR Analysis(review updated until commit cdb1d67)
PR Feedback💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are logically grouped. The addition of the unique code field to the Case model is a good enhancement. However, it would be beneficial to add tests to ensure the new functionality works as expected and to prevent potential regressions in the future. ✨ Usage guide:Overview: With a configuration file, use the following template:
See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool. |
|
Persistent review updated to latest commit cdb1d67 |
| @@ -93,6 +95,12 @@ def attachment_count | |||
| end | |||
|
|
|||
| private | |||
|
|
|||
| def set_unique_code | |||
| highest_code = Case.maximum(:code).to_s.sub("CODE-", '').to_i | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling the case where the Case.maximum(:code) returns nil, which might happen if there are no cases in the database yet. [important]
| description: description | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| if new_case.save |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be better to handle the case where the new_case.save operation fails due to reasons other than validation errors, such as database issues. In such cases, it would be helpful to log the error and return a more generic error message to the user. [medium]
| if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>; | ||
| if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>; | ||
|
|
||
| const { name, status, priority, code } = data.case; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling the case where the data.case is null or undefined to prevent potential runtime errors. [medium]
|
@CodiumAI-Agent Improve |
| def set_unique_code | ||
| highest_code = Case.maximum(:code).to_s.sub("CODE-", '').to_i | ||
| self.code = "CODE-#{highest_code + 1}" | ||
| end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Consider using a more robust method to generate unique codes. The current method might lead to race conditions where two cases could potentially get the same code if they are created at the same time. [possible issue]
| def set_unique_code | |
| highest_code = Case.maximum(:code).to_s.sub("CODE-", '').to_i | |
| self.code = "CODE-#{highest_code + 1}" | |
| end | |
| def set_unique_code | |
| self.code = generate_unique_code | |
| end | |
| def generate_unique_code | |
| loop do | |
| code = "CODE-#{SecureRandom.hex(4)}" | |
| break code unless Case.exists?(code: code) | |
| end | |
| end |
| if new_case.save | ||
| { case: new_case, errors: [] } | ||
| else | ||
| { case: nil, errors: new_case.errors.full_messages } | ||
| end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Consider handling the case where the case creation fails due to validation errors. Currently, the error messages are returned but the client might not know how to handle them. [enhancement]
| if new_case.save | |
| { case: new_case, errors: [] } | |
| else | |
| { case: nil, errors: new_case.errors.full_messages } | |
| end | |
| if new_case.save | |
| { case: new_case, errors: [] } | |
| else | |
| raise GraphQL::ExecutionError, new_case.errors.full_messages.join(", ") | |
| end |
| if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>; | ||
| if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>; | ||
|
|
||
| const { name, status, priority, code } = data.case; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Consider handling the case where the data object is undefined. This could happen if the GraphQL query returns an error. [possible issue]
| const { name, status, priority, code } = data.case; | |
| if (!data || !data.case) return <p>No data returned from the server</p>; | |
| const { name, status, priority, code } = data.case; |
| def set_unique_code | ||
| highest_code = Case.maximum(:code).to_s.sub("CODE-", '').to_i | ||
| self.code = "CODE-#{highest_code + 1}" | ||
| end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Consider using a more robust way to generate unique codes. The current method may lead to race conditions where two cases could potentially get the same code. [possible issue]
| def set_unique_code | |
| highest_code = Case.maximum(:code).to_s.sub("CODE-", '').to_i | |
| self.code = "CODE-#{highest_code + 1}" | |
| end | |
| def set_unique_code | |
| self.code = generate_unique_code | |
| end | |
| def generate_unique_code | |
| loop do | |
| new_code = "CODE-#{SecureRandom.hex(4)}" | |
| break new_code unless Case.exists?(code: new_code) | |
| end | |
| end |
| def resolve(name:, status_id:, priority_id:, created_by_id:, assigned_to_id: nil, description: nil) | ||
| new_case = Case.new( | ||
| name: name, | ||
| status_id: status_id, | ||
| priority_id: priority_id, | ||
| created_by_id: created_by_id, | ||
| assigned_to_id: assigned_to_id, | ||
| description: description | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| if new_case.save | ||
| { case: new_case, errors: [] } | ||
| else | ||
| { case: nil, errors: new_case.errors.full_messages } | ||
| end | ||
| end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Consider handling the case where the status_id, priority_id, created_by_id, or assigned_to_id provided do not correspond to any existing records in the database. Currently, it would raise an error. [possible issue]
| def resolve(name:, status_id:, priority_id:, created_by_id:, assigned_to_id: nil, description: nil) | |
| new_case = Case.new( | |
| name: name, | |
| status_id: status_id, | |
| priority_id: priority_id, | |
| created_by_id: created_by_id, | |
| assigned_to_id: assigned_to_id, | |
| description: description | |
| ) | |
| if new_case.save | |
| { case: new_case, errors: [] } | |
| else | |
| { case: nil, errors: new_case.errors.full_messages } | |
| end | |
| end | |
| def resolve(name:, status_id:, priority_id:, created_by_id:, assigned_to_id: nil, description: nil) | |
| new_case = Case.new( | |
| name: name, | |
| status_id: status_id, | |
| priority_id: priority_id, | |
| created_by_id: created_by_id, | |
| assigned_to_id: assigned_to_id, | |
| description: description | |
| ) | |
| if new_case.valid? | |
| new_case.save | |
| { case: new_case, errors: [] } | |
| else | |
| { case: nil, errors: new_case.errors.full_messages } | |
| end | |
| rescue ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound => e | |
| { case: nil, errors: [e.message] } | |
| end |
| const CaseDetailsComponent = ({ caseId }) => { | ||
| const { data, loading, error } = useQuery(CASE_DETAILS_QUERY, { | ||
| variables: { id: caseId }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>; | ||
| if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>; | ||
|
|
||
| const { name, status, priority, code } = data.case; | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <div className="case-details"> | ||
| <h1>{name}</h1> | ||
| <div className="case-metadata"> | ||
| <span className="case-code">Code: {code}</span> | ||
| <span className="case-status">Status: {status.name}</span> | ||
| <span className="case-priority">Priority: {priority.name}</span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Consider adding error handling for the case when the caseId prop is not provided or is invalid. Currently, it would result in a GraphQL error. [possible issue]
| const CaseDetailsComponent = ({ caseId }) => { | |
| const { data, loading, error } = useQuery(CASE_DETAILS_QUERY, { | |
| variables: { id: caseId }, | |
| }); | |
| if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>; | |
| if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>; | |
| const { name, status, priority, code } = data.case; | |
| return ( | |
| <div className="case-details"> | |
| <h1>{name}</h1> | |
| <div className="case-metadata"> | |
| <span className="case-code">Code: {code}</span> | |
| <span className="case-status">Status: {status.name}</span> | |
| <span className="case-priority">Priority: {priority.name}</span> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| ); | |
| const CaseDetailsComponent = ({ caseId }) => { | |
| if (!caseId) { | |
| return <p>Case ID is required.</p>; | |
| } | |
| const { data, loading, error } = useQuery(CASE_DETAILS_QUERY, { | |
| variables: { id: caseId }, | |
| }); | |
| if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>; | |
| if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>; | |
| const { name, status, priority, code } = data.case; | |
| return ( | |
| <div className="case-details"> | |
| <h1>{name}</h1> | |
| <div className="case-metadata"> | |
| <span className="case-code">Code: {code}</span> | |
| <span className="case-status">Status: {status.name}</span> | |
| <span className="case-priority">Priority: {priority.name}</span> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| ); | |
| }; |
PR Feedback (click)
Description
This pull request adds a code field to the Case model in the backend and displays it in the UI. It also includes a migration to add the code column to the cases table in the database. Additionally, a new GraphQL mutation
CreateCaseis implemented to create a new case with the required parameters. Finally, a new componentCaseDetailsComponentis added to the frontend to display the case details, including the code.Summary
codefield to theCasemodel in the backendcodecolumn to thecasestable in the databaseCreateCaseto create a new case with the required parametersCaseDetailsComponentto the frontend to display the case details, including the codeFixes #118.
🎉 Latest improvements to Sweep:
💡 To get Sweep to edit this pull request, you can: