Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add automation around docs generation #275

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 14, 2018
Merged

Conversation

ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

@ruflin ruflin commented Dec 13, 2018

This adds an almost empty index.asciidoc file to generate the initial asciidoc version of the docs. With this make docs can be used to generate and preview the docs.

This allows us to also validate the docs build in CI.

This adds an almost empty `index.asciidoc` file to generate the initial asciidoc version of the docs. With this `make docs` can be used to generate and preview the docs.
Copy link
Contributor

@webmat webmat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ruflin
Copy link
Contributor Author

ruflin commented Dec 13, 2018

@karenzone From now on all docs PR will also be tested to check if they are valid.

@ruflin ruflin merged commit a63db96 into elastic:master Dec 14, 2018
@ruflin ruflin deleted the docs-automation branch December 14, 2018 07:31
webmat pushed a commit to webmat/ecs that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2019
This adds an almost empty `index.asciidoc` file to generate the initial asciidoc version of the docs. With this `make docs` can be used to generate and preview the docs.
webmat added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2019
)

Backport of PR #275 to 1.0 branch. Original message:

This adds an almost empty `index.asciidoc` file to generate the initial asciidoc version of the docs. With this `make docs` can be used to generate and preview the docs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants